What is it that you are really looking for when you choose the
leaders who will make or break your business? After eight years of
designing and using competency frameworks in large organisations I
was still searching for an elusive piece of this jigsaw. Robust
behavioural assessment, psychometric tools, skills evaluation, and
experience inventories were generating a wealth of valuable
decision-making data, but the really fundamental questions
remained. What is this person really like? What will they create
around them? What is the true nature of their potential
contribution to the business?
My quest led me to join The Thinking Partnership (then OCG)
whose inside-out approach to the assessment and development of
leadership skills addresses these questions head-on. Rather than
putting an individual under the microscope and dissecting them into
a series of component parts, we start at the other end, work in
partnership with people to develop a holistic understanding of
their underlying character and gauge different aspects of their
intelligence.
I recall vividly my first conversation with The Thinking
Partnership, who had been developing a character-based approach to
assessment and development for nearly a decade. "Yes, that's
exactly what I want, but can we really do that? Competency testing,
for all its limitations and frustrations is the only way of
achieving a fair, objective process. Isn't it? I know we all judge
character continually, whether we're working out how much we want
to work with or for someone, or choosing who to vote for in an
election, but isn't that a subjective process that's impossible to
harness for rigorous measurement?"
A few years, and scores of character assessments later, it's
clear to me that in fact it's the only way to reliably evaluate the
nature and extent of a person's capacity to perform in a complex
leadership role over time. People choose to follow leaders, or not,
on the basis of their personal experience and evaluations of them,
so this perspective is critical to getting a clear fix on
leadership capability.
The key to tapping into our innate ability to judge character in
a way which bridges the gap between subjective opinion and
objective consistency is a robust and powerful suite of
character-based assessment technologies developed by The Thinking
Partnership. Broadly, this comprises a research-based and
data-driven benchmark framework of character, intelligences and
leadership, and a powerful and robust suite of assessment
technologies which tap directly into an individual's underlying
characteristics and talents. Crucial to these technologies is the
way in which they are brought to life by the trademark ability of
our consultants to connect with senior people, and engage them in
the task of creating an accurate and useful picture of who they
are.
The resulting profile provides an in-depth insight into each
aspect of an individual's underlying character and intelligences,
and a rich picture of them as a leader. It pinpoints the unique
pattern of signature strengths and balancing limitations for the
individual and how these are likely to play out in a specific role,
team and organisation. The profile also gives benchmarking scores
which provide clear sight of the relative strengths of the
candidate compared with peers from a cross-section of industries.
And the unexpected bonus for me was the way in which this approach
to assessment switches people on, sharpening their awareness of
their talents, and engaging the individual with the task of really
bringing their talents to life within an organisation.
So, have I left my competency-based roots completely behind? No,
in situations where the behavioural and technical competencies a
leader needs are predictable and can be realistically simulated or
checked for testing, they remain a useful tool. I appreciate the
merit of values-led competency models that can help individuals and
organisations test out the mutual fit in terms of beliefs and view
of the world. I'm just glad to have the piece of the jigsaw that
enables me to assess the capability of a leader to thrive and
prosper in a future which they will build for themselves and the
people around them.
Clients consult us around character in a range of situations,
from those you might expect such as recruitment decisions and
programmatic reviews of management bench-strength, to the more
creative, such as strategic or cultural change initiatives. After
all, isn't culture simply a potent combination of an organisation's
heritage and the character of the people who currently lead it, and
isn't it the fundamental characteristics and judgement of these
people that will make or break your business?
To contact Helen Hopper, click here.
What is it that you are really looking for when you
choose the leaders who will make or break your business? After
eight years of designing and using competency frameworks in large
organisations I was still searching for an elusive piece of this
jigsaw. Robust behavioural assessment, psychometric tools, skills
evaluation, and experience inventories were generating a wealth of
valuable decision-making data, but the really fundamental questions
remained. What is this person really like? What will they create
around them? What is the true nature of their potential
contribution to the business?
My quest led me to join The Thinking Partnership
(then OCG) whose inside-out approach to the assessment and
development of leadership skills addresses these questions head-on.
Rather than putting an individual under the microscope and
dissecting them into a series of component parts, we start at the
other end, work in partnership with people to develop a holistic
understanding of their underlying character and gauge different
aspects of their intelligence.
I recall vividly my first conversation with The
Thinking Partnership, who had been developing a character-based
approach to assessment and development for nearly a decade. "Yes,
that's exactly what I want, but can we really do that? Competency
testing, for all its limitations and frustrations is the only way
of achieving a fair, objective process. Isn't it? I know we all
judge character continually, whether we're working out how much we
want to work with or for someone, or choosing who to vote for in an
election, but isn't that a subjective process that's impossible to
harness for rigorous measurement?"
A few years, and scores of character assessments
later, it's clear to me that in fact it's the only way to reliably
evaluate the nature and extent of a person's capacity to perform in
a complex leadership role over time. People choose to follow
leaders, or not, on the basis of their personal experience and
evaluations of them, so this perspective is critical to getting a
clear fix on leadership capability.
The key to tapping into our innate ability to judge
character in a way which bridges the gap between subjective opinion
and objective consistency is a robust and powerful suite of
character-based assessment technologies developed by The Thinking
Partnership. Broadly, this comprises a research-based and
data-driven benchmark framework of character, intelligences and
leadership, and a powerful and robust suite of assessment
technologies which tap directly into an individual's underlying
characteristics and talents. Crucial to these technologies is the
way in which they are brought to life by the trademark ability of
our consultants to connect with senior people, and engage them in
the task of creating an accurate and useful picture of who they
are.
<<Insert 3-box slide for for PDF, not for
web>>
The resulting profile provides an in-depth insight
into each aspect of an individual's underlying character and
intelligences, and a rich picture of them as a leader. It pinpoints
the unique pattern of signature strengths and balancing limitations
for the individual and how these are likely to play out in a
specific role, team and organisation. The profile also gives
benchmarking scores which provide clear sight of the relative
strengths of the candidate compared with peers from a cross-section
of industries. And the unexpected bonus for me was the way in which
this approach to assessment switches people on, sharpening their
awareness of their talents, and engaging the individual with the
task of really bringing their talents to life within an
organisation.
So, have I left my competency-based roots
completely behind? No, in situations where the behavioural and
technical competencies a leader needs are predictable and can be
realistically simulated or checked for testing, they remain a
useful tool. I appreciate the merit of values-led competency models
that can help individuals and organisations test out the mutual fit
in terms of beliefs and view of the world. I'm just glad to have
the piece of the jigsaw that enables me to assess the capability of
a leader to thrive and prosper in a future which they will build
for themselves and the people around them.
Clients consult us around character in a range of
situations, from those you might expect such as recruitment
decisions and programmatic reviews of management bench-strength, to
the more creative, such as strategic or cultural change
initiatives. After all, isn't culture simply a potent combination
of an organisation's heritage and the character of the people who
currently lead it, and isn't it the fundamental characteristics and
judgement of these people that will make or break your
business?